How To Put Replay On Apple Music

If you use otherstreaming services, though, you can still share your music listening history for the year. That includes top songs, artists and albums in a series of colorful visuals specifically designed for social media. However, if it's not already in your library, Apple Music users can head to the dedicated Apple Music Replay website to add the playlist. Spotify Wrapped 2020 has also expanded the number of playlists available to its users. Every music source has their idea of top artists, albums, and songs for the year but apple music is an excellent indicator of the music that best. First of all, apple music replay tells you exactly how many hours of music you've listened to this year.

It also reveals how many different artists you've listened and who your most popular artists are. Head to music.apple.com/replay and you will be given the option to "get your replay mix". From there you can find out who your most streamed artists were this year, the total amount of time you spent listening and your favourite albums. You will also be presented with a playlist of your top 100 songs of the year. Apple Music launched on June 30, 2015, in 100 countries. New users receive a three-month free trial subscription, which changes to a monthly fee after three months.

A family plan allows six users to share a subscription at a reduced rate. Apple originally sought to enter the market at a lower price point for the service, but the music industry rejected the plan. The service debuted as an updated Music app on the iOS 8.4 update. Apple TV and Android device support was planned for a "fall" 2015 launch. A previously unreleased song by Pharrell Williams, entitled "Freedom", was used in promotional material and announced as an exclusive release on the launch of the service.

The "History of Sound" advert for the launch of the Apple Music service was soundtracked by the tune There Is No Light by Wildbirds & Peacedrums, from their 2009 album The Snake. Upon its launch, Beats Music subscriptions and playlists were migrated to Apple Music, and the service was discontinued. When a song is playing, a "Now Playing" bar appears above the bottom navigation bar. When viewed, the Now Playing section allows users to add a song to their library, download it to their device, and like or dislike the song to improve suggestions on the "Listen Now" tab.

Other functions of the "Now Playing" section include the ability to control what music plays next and put songs on shuffle or repeat. Additionally, users can view live lyrics of the song they are listening to through the now playing card, which displays the song's lyrics live in sync with the time while it plays to the user. Apple has announced that it's introducing a year-end feature called Apple Music Replay. And as HITC reports, Apple Music Replay will also show you stats including how many hours of music you've listened to on the service this year, how many times you've listened to your favorite songs, and more. Apple Music and Spotify are two of the biggest streaming services in the world.

Spotify launched Wrapped in 2017 and since then users have waited eagerly to find out what their end of year music stats are. Wait for a bit while Apple generates your Replay stats for 2021. Once the process is done, you'll be able to see all the details on the same page, from how many hours of music you've listened to, to your most played songs of 2021. Keep scrolling down to discover more stats. There's no share button, so you'll need to take screenshots and share them manually to your social media profiles.

Autoplay Mode, designated by an infinity (∞) symbol, has been added to allow users to stream music endlessly. First, the Music app will play all queued songs, albums, and playlists. Once finished, it will play music based on music in your library and playlists, similar to an existing Spotify feature.

Apple Music Replay is a new feature which allows Apple Music users to get access to all of their most played stats. To use it all you have to do is visit the Apple Music Replay website, sign in to your Apple account and click "Get Your Replay Mix". It then immediately generates a selection of playlists based on your personal stats and tells you some key information you probably never knew about your listening habits. In fact, Apple Replay was launched ahead of time, which meant you could listen to Replay at any point during the year if you listened to enough music. Even though the feature was created to mark the end of the year, it's updated weekly so you can use Replay at any point to listen to your favorite songs. Apple Music also made it possible for users to save their Replay playlists as well as share with other Apple Music members.

Dubbed Music Replay, the music service will create a playlist of everything that has been booming through your headphones this past year. Apple is bringing a new feature to its music streaming service in the hopes to bring Apple Music on par with Spotify and other similar services. The new feature is called Replay and lets Apple Music users check out their favorite music from 2019. Just like the iOS app, Now Mac Users have a new dedicated app for play or manage music that locally saved on Mac or Playing an online song from Apple Music subscription service. Repeat the same song or album is quite handy while we are playing our favorite music on Mac.

Here's the option for repeat songs on the music app on Mac. From the same window itself, you can see the number of times each song you have played throughout the entire year. You could only see the count of play only once from this window, and it will not show you further if you to the playlists and start playing tracks. After adding the playlist to your library, you can simply open the Apple Music app on your Mac or even the iTunes app on Windows, and find the Replay playlist. Only the playlist creation is limited to the web but can be streamed from any platform.

Apple Music users in 2019 have seen a lot of facelifts and updates to the music streaming service, especially post-release of the iOS 13. Newly added stations on Apple Music helps users discover new music and the songs which match their tastes easily. If you have been looking to recap all your songs played in the past whole year, Apple has a solution for you – Apple Music Replay. Apple Music's major redesign in iOS 10 received more positive reviews.

Jordan Novet of VentureBeat wrote positively about the changes, stating "Apple has improved the overall design, as well as the experience". Apple Music Replay shows users their total listening time for the year, alongside a playlist of your top 100 songs of the year, your top artists, and your top albums. You can also add your Replay 2021 playlist to your Apple Music library, as well as playlists for prior years dating back to 2015 as well. Interestingly, Apple actually improves on some of what we've seen from Spotify Wrapped. That's something that Spotify doesn't cater for.

Instead, your playlist is typically locked with data pulled from your library between January and late October. Similar to Spotify Wrapped, Apple Music has a feature called 2020 Replay that lets you see your most-played songs, artists and albums, and get a playlist of your top songs of the year. Technically, you can access your Replay at any point during the year, not just in December. The app really needs a tag/filter system.

So many other Apple first party apps have added nice filter systems where you can select criteria to delve down into what you're looking for. Maps, Fitness, the Apple Store app, and several others have filters, and even Notes and Reminders now having Tags and Smart Lists. Apple Music desperately needs something similar to use music metadata (Artist, Genre, Year, Star Rating, Last Played etc…) to sift through and delve into the music you want to hear. For example, a user should be able to select "metal", "1985", and "3 stars and above" and get a dynamic playlist of all his favorite metal songs from 1985.

Change the criteria and it immediately populates a new dynamic playlist. Apple Maps recently added something analogous for POIs, and this would be great for Apple Music. It would be so simple from a user's perspective, and yet so powerful with so many possibilities. To expound on point #2 in the 'Technicals' section earlier, the matching problems result in a constant feeling of your library being ephemeral and inconsistent. The streaming ecosystem feels like it exists in a quantum state, where things just appear and disappear out of existence.

A song you downloaded from an album gets matched back to a single or greatest hits album. The 'Show Complete Album' feature often brings you to a compilation. Music you've downloaded gets greyed out and removed. Your library never feels like it's on solid ground.

The fact is that even though this is a streaming service we pay for monthly, music we download should have a feeling of permanency. Just because we're renting our stuff monthly doesn't mean we don't want to maintain collections of that rented stuff. Tidal's version of Spotify Wrapped is called My 2021 Rewind. It highlights your mos- listened-to songs and artists of the year and of each month through a playlist and shareable graphic for social media. Last year the 2020 Rewind feature appeared on Dec. 1, so you should expect to see 2021 Rewind very soon.

Once it does arrive, open the Tidal app or go to the homepage on desktop and you should see My 2021 Rewind. You can access the feature on the Apple Music Web Player, once you arrive simply select 'Get your Replay Mix' and it will generate a playlist featuring your most played songs of 2019. Not only that, you'll also get to see a breakdown of your favorite artists and how often you listen to them. There's also a breakdown of your top 10 favorite albums and how often you listen to those as well.

Finally, Apple will generate songs for your most played songs for previous years as well, in case you want to take a trip down memory lane. Apple Music received mixed reviews at launch. Among the criticism, reviewers wrote that the user interface was "not intuitive", and an "embarrassing and confusing mess". They also wrote about battery life problems.

However, the service was praised for its smart functions. Each artist page includes a profile banner and a "Play" button which automatically creates a radio station based around the artist. Artist pages also include sections for their featured releases, albums, singles, top songs, and background information.

Apple Music users can create their own profile on the service, thus allowing them to follow other users and see what music their followers are listening to. That said, Apple doesn't offer anywhere close to the same level of insight found with Wrapped 2020. One such option for iPhone owners is Snd.Wave, which is free to download but locks some advanced features behind an in-app purchase. Apple Music Replay is back and it's telling Apple Music users what their most played artists, songs and albums of 2020 are.

Apple Music launched their own version of Spotify Wrapped called Apple Music Replay which reveals your Top Songs, Top Artists and Top Albums of the year and more. Apple Music is one of the most remarkable music streaming applications in the world. IPhone, iPad, and Mac users get the app by default, while Android and Windows users enjoy the privilege of downloading the Apple goodness for free from official sources. Apple Music is Apple's music streaming service.

Audio files can be streamed or downloaded for offline play, and there are also song and genre-based radio stations available. Apple Music integrates with one's existing iCloud Music Library to combine Apple Music songs with songs that you have previously purchased on iTunes. Apple Music users can access their data, via the "Replay" feature, in a few ways. To simply access the playlist of your 100 most played songs, go to the "Listen Now" tab in the Apple Music app and scroll to the bottom of the page. Once there, you'll see your Replay for 2020 and every year you've had Apple Music. The annual feature gives fans the ability to see their most-listened-to songs, albums and artists of that past year as well as seeing how much time theyve spent playing music on the app.

Apple uses your Apple Music listening history to provide you with the songs, albums, and artists you listen to the most every year. Each year your Apple Music stats are compiled into a single playlist called a Replay. Apple Music is a paid music and video streaming service subscription developed by Apple which allows users to both stream music on-demand and listen to existing playlists. Spotifygot a lot of play on social mediawith its Wrapped feature, which highlighted the songs and artists you had on repeat this year .

But you can do the same on Apple Music with Replay. On the web, navigate tobeta.music.apple.com/replayfor a rundown of your 2019 favorites. Essentially, Spotify Wrapped is a yearly event the platform releases to give users a look at the year that has passed.

This summary contains a list of the songs and artists you listened to repeatedly. Spotify Wrapped also summarizes the mood your streaming history paints. However, this summary only happens once a year and there is no option to get a wrap any other time of the year.

While listening to a song on your album or playlist, tap the icon at the bottom of the player screen. Doing so will expand the section and allow you to view which songs or videos will be playing next. Open the Music app and play a song or album. Then tap the now playing button at the bottom of the screen. In Step 2 you will tap the three-line icon in the bottom right corner and then tap the icon to the right of Up Next. You can repeat an album or playlist by tapping the repeat icon once, or you can repeat a song by tapping it twice.

We're at the end of the year, which means a swarm of personalized "year in review" lists from the apps and platforms you use the most. One of the first up is the Apple Music streaming service. But Apple is a bit of an outlier here as the Apple Music recap feature, called "Replay '21," is actually available all year round and updated weekly. That way, multiple genres or descriptors can be used to tag each artist/album/song. This goes back to a broad point of mine regarding how Apple Music's organizational system is too rigid.

Everything about Apple Music obeys a nested folder structure, when it should obey a tag structure. The Music Library should feel permanent and the sorting and organizational tools should be light and dynamic. The organizational tools are stiff and heavy, while the music library has no permanency or solid footing to it.

This applies to genre listings, as well. There are two primary types of music listeners — those who maintain libraries and those who don't. Some people like to collect hundreds, if not thousands of albums, organize them, maintain them, and play back the specific music they want to hear at that specific moment. Spotify Wrapped is an annual retrospective of your listening habits for the year. It lets you see how many minutes you streamed, check your most-played songs and artists, check out new artists you discovered, and more. After comparing these two streaming services, Apple Music is a better option than Spotify Premium simply because it currently offers high-resolution streaming.

Standard Work Week Hours By Country

The chapter also provides an update on working time trends across OECD countries. It shows that usual weekly hours, and the incidence of paid overtime have remained relatively stable over recent decades. Taken together , parallel trends in average annual hours worked, average time spent on leisure, and hourly productivity suggest that productivity increases have not led to extra leisure time. One possible explanation for this is that workers faced with a decreasing labour share have opted for increases in hourly wages rather than reduction in hours worked.

In Germany, the April 2020 Working Hours Ordinance authorised an extension of daily working time up to 12 hours, while the weekly working time could be extended beyond 60 hours in exceptional cases. In Greece, between March and August 2020, employers who had exhausted the legally prescribed overtime ceilings of their workers, could use overtime without approval from the Ministry of Labour and Social Affairs in the respect of maximum daily limits. In Israel, the Ministry of Labour introduced in March 2020 a temporary permission to work additional hours up to 67 hours a week but no longer than 90 extra hours a month. The permission also included the possibility to work up to 14 hours a day including overtime, up to 8 times a month.

In Norway and Sweden,75 national-level collective agreements gave room for more flexibility to actors at the local level regarding the extended use of overtime. Although standard hours agreed on at the sectoral level in Germany have not changed since the beginning of the century, some companies applying such agreements have increased standard hours. For some industries, collective bargaining agreements concluded at the industry level between trade unions and employers allow establishments, under certain conditions, to deviate from collectively agreed standards on pay and working time.

In the 2005 wave of the Institute for Employment Research's Establishment Panel, 13% of establishments had such agreements, and 52% of them made such changes, usually in standard hours . In the metalworking industry, for example, the collective agreement allows 13–18% of the workforce to deviate from the standard 35-hour week and to work between 35 and 40 hours. In addition, under certain conditions, up to 50% of employees could work up to 40 hours. The agreement also stipulates that jobs must not be cut as a consequence of increasing the quota above 18% and that hours beyond 35 hours will be paid, but without an overtime premium .

As for normal hours, procedural requirements and modalities vary across OECD countries. In Austria and Denmark, averaging of maximum weekly hours requires a collective agreement. In Estonia, Germany, Latvia, Norway and Portugal, the averaging of maximum weekly hours can be introduced pending employees' consent. In Hungary,25 the Netherlands, Slovenia or Sweden, maximum weekly hours can be averaged unilaterally by employers. Reducing standard hours in order to distribute a given amount of work over more employees has been a popular policy tool in several countries, in particular in the 1980s and 1990s. However, econometric evidence suggests that, at best, there were no positive employment effects, mainly because hourly wages were increased in order to leave monthly pay unchanged.

In the early 2000s, and bucking the trend, several firms in Germany increased standard hours. Theoretical studies show that several conditions must be met for an increase in standard hours to have positive employment effects. In the short term, when output is fixed, extensions in standard hours may even have detrimental effects on employment. In the long term, the outcome is more optimistic, and additional jobs may be created. However, the employment effects crucially depend on the response of hourly wages.

If hourly wages fall, keeping monthly income constant, employees who had been working before the increase in hours are clearly worse off , but employment is likely to rise. Irrespective of the quantitative effect of any employment increases, the reduction in labor costs should help to protect jobs in firms under competitive pressure. Looking at trends in usual weekly hours and weekly overtime illustrates how the usual week of the average full-time employee in the OECD has evolved in the last decades. However, it cannot be used to assess how the overall quantity of work per full-time employee changed over time, since the latter is also a function of the number of weeks worked , in addition to the usual amount of work per week. However, there are no sources allowing for a reliable comparison of days off taken across countries.

Mexican labour law states that employees working during the day can work 48 hours per week . Overtime is capped at 9 hours per week which must be paid at 100% of the normal wage. There is little regulation of rest periods and a minimum of 6 days paid annual leave after 1 year of service. In 2019, Mexico had the highest recorded average of 2137 annual working hours in the world. The Working time regulation is one of the oldest concerns of labour legislation in the world. Early, in the 19th century, it was recognized that working excessive hours posed a real danger to workers' health and their families.

The working hours limits has been effective since the first ILO Convention, the Hours of Work Convention, 1919 (No. 1), which stipulates the principle of the eight-hour day and 48-hour week for the manufacturing sector. The reduction of working hours was one of the original objectives of employment regulation. A number of instruments including international labour standards have been used to help implement this regulatory framework in countries. National legislation is a second instrument of working-time regulation, and collective agreements are a third. Whaples finds that among the most important city-level determinants of the workweek during this period were the availability of a pool of agricultural workers, the capital-labor ratio, horsepower per worker, and the amount of employment in large establishments.

Eastern European immigrants worked significantly longer than others, as did people in industries whose output varied considerably from season to season. High unionization and strike levels reduced hours to a small degree. The average female employee worked about six and a half fewer hours per week in 1919 than did the average male employee. In city-level comparisons, state maximum hours laws appear to have had little affect on average work hours, once the influences of other factors have been taken into account. One possibility is that these laws were passed only after economic forces lowered the length of the workweek.

Hours In A Work Week By Country Overall, in cities where wages were one percent higher, hours were about -0.13 to -0.05 percent lower. Again, this suggests that during the era of declining hours, workers were willing to use higher wages to "buy" shorter hours. Historically employers and employees often agreed on very long workweeks because the economy was not very productive (by today's standards) and people had to work long hours to earn enough money to feed, clothe and house their families.

The long-term decline in the length of the workweek, in this view, has primarily been due to increased economic productivity, which has yielded higher wages for workers. Workers responded to this rise in potential income by "buying" more leisure time, as well as by buying more goods and services. In a recent survey, a sizeable majority of economic historians agreed with this view. Over eighty percent accepted the proposition that "the reduction in the length of the workweek in American manufacturing before the Great Depression was primarily due to economic growth and the increased wages it brought" .

For example, roughly two-thirds of economic historians surveyed rejected the proposition that the efforts of labor unions were the primary cause of the drop in work hours before the Great Depression. Here again, Figure 5.3 does not display a clear-cut relationship between the degree of variation allowed in the rules and the actual degree of variation in outcomes observed. The median amount of paid overtime for full-time employees tend to stay within the limits fixed in the law or in higher level collective agreements in most countries47 that give extensive possibility for the upper limit on overtime to vary.

Working time is a crucial variable shaping the labour market and its adaptability to shocks. It can affect key labour market outcomes, such as workers' well-being, productivity, wages and employment. Documenting how OECD countries regulate working time, and understanding how different regulatory settings shape working time outcomes is crucial for policy makers seeking to balance equity, efficiency and welfare considerations. This chapter offers a detailed review of regulations governing working hours, paid leave, and teleworking in OECD countries.

It discusses the role of collective bargaining in negotiating working hours or working time arrangements, and how OECD countries have adapted their working time regulation during the COVID-19 crisis. The chapter also provides an update on working time patterns and trends in time use across OECD countries and socio-demographic groups. It measures how differences across workers in working time outcomes have changed over time and driven inequalities in work-life balance. It seems plausible to look at firm−union bargaining models to explain the change in hourly wages accompanying an increase in standard hours , because the increases in standard hours in Germany often took place in large unionized firms.

However, the response of hourly wages under collective bargaining agreements is difficult to predict. Any response in monthly pay may also depend on the original level of working time. If original working time was low, monthly pay is less likely to increase very much (see for a formal model). Therefore, all else being equal, it might be easier to increase employment by increasing standard hours in countries where working time is comparatively low. It should also be kept in mind that the existence of minimum wages may rule out a drop in the hourly wages of workers on the lower part of the wage distribution following an increase in standard hours. Finally, it is an open question how hourly wages respond in the long term.

Compared to the European countries listed here, similar regulations apply to employees in federally regulated industries in Canada. There are industry and regional variations, but generally, employment law limits the workweek to a maximum of 48 hours, including overtime. Overtime is allowed and must be paid at a rate of 1.5 times the normal wage.

However, compared to its European counterparts, the average annual working hours in 2019 were higher at 1670 hours. The number of RTT days varies every year but is around 10 days annually. Another scenario is also possible, in which monthly wages and hours are jointly determined in long-term contractual agreements . In other words, market equilibrium may be thought of as reflecting the satisfaction of joint preferences across employers and individual workers with labor demand equal to labor supply at all hours worked .

To preserve a given package of hours and earnings, firms and individual workers respond to regulatory measures by adjusting the hourly wage rate and possibly overtime hours. Keeping the hourly wage and total hours constant would reduce earnings because a smaller fraction of workers will receive an overtime premium because a smaller fraction of hours is compensated with an overtime premium. Thus, to maintain the agreed earnings, hourly wages will be adjusted upward and the increase in standard hours will have no effect on total hours and employment. This scenario differs from the one described previously, in which the hourly wage falls to keep monthly earnings constant when total hours rise. The effects of overtime regulation in the US are found not to be fully consistent with either the labor demand model or with the fixed hours/average wage model . One criticism of the fixed hours/average wage model is that only a fraction of workers work overtime and for those who do not work overtime an increase in standard hours will inevitably change hours worked.

Many countries regulate the work week by law, such as stipulating minimum daily rest periods, annual holidays, and a maximum number of working hours per week. Working time may vary from person to person, often depending on economic conditions, location, culture, lifestyle choice, and the profitability of the individual's livelihood. For example, someone who is supporting children and paying a large mortgage might need to work more hours to meet basic costs of living than someone of the same earning power with lower housing costs.

In developed countries like the United Kingdom, some workers are part-time because they are unable to find full-time work, but many choose reduced work hours to care for children or other family; some choose it simply to increase leisure time. In Belgium, the Czech Republic, Denmark, Latvia, and the Slovak Republic, rules governing maximum weekly hours/overtime are likely to be mostly uniform. The upper limit is binding, but there is a limited possibility to use averaging mechanisms, only with the employee's consent or through a collective agreement.

In all these countries but Latvia and Denmark, there is a binding minimum compensation for overtime hours . As the length of the workweek gradually declined, political agitation for shorter hours seems to have waned for the next two decades. However, immediately after the Civil War reductions in the length of the workweek reemerged as an important issue for organized labor. Roediger argues that many of the new ideas about shorter hours grew out of the abolitionists' critique of slavery — that long hours, like slavery, stunted aggregate demand in the economy. The leading proponent of this idea, Ira Steward, argued that decreasing the length of the workweek would raise the standard of living of workers by raising their desired consumption levels as their leisure expanded, and by ending unemployment.

The hub of the newly launched movement was Boston and Grand Eight Hours Leagues sprang up around the country in 1865 and 1866. The leaders of the movement called the meeting of the first national organization to unite workers of different trades, the National Labor Union, which met in Baltimore in 1867. The passage of the state laws did foment action by workers — especially in Chicago where parades, a general strike, rioting and martial law ensued.

In only a few places did work hours fall after the passage of these laws. Many become disillusioned with the idea of using the government to promote shorter hours and by the late 1860s, efforts to push for a universal eight-hour day had been put on the back burner. The second block was dedicated to the regulation of the amount of hours worked . The third block examined the regulation of leave and public holidays. The fourth block looked at the regulation of the organisation of working time (e.g. unsocial hours and flexible working time arrangements).

The fifth block collected information related to the existence of short-time work and more generally job retention schemes and how they have been adjusted as a response to the COVID-19 crisis . Finally, the sixth block focused on recent reforms of working time regulation. In Germany, the total volume of paid overtime hours was cut in half between 1991 and 2014, while unpaid work rose 16% and now exceeds the amount of paid overtime.

In 2014, employees worked on average 21.1 paid overtime hours and 27.8 unpaid overtime hours. Paid overtime constituted just 1.6% of all hours worked (Wanger et al., 2015). Still, the actual volume of 0.8 billion overtime hours is equivalent—assuming equal productivity—to about 550,000 employees working standard hours. According to data from the IAB Establishment Panel, in 2011, 21% of private establishments paid overtime, and 55% of their employees actually worked paid overtime; 19% of all employees in the private sector worked paid overtime.

The difference between collectively agreed standard hours per week and reported actual working hours is 2.7 hours, which is larger than in most other European countries . In the short term, when it is difficult to boost output, increasing standard hours is likely to have negative employment effects. Over a longer period, when output and capital can vary, positive employment effects are more probable if monthly pay remains unchanged. However, if hourly wages remain unchanged or decline, employees who had been working before the hours increase are worse off. Extending standard hours can also safeguard jobs in firms under competitive pressure.

It may be advisable to have flexible arrangements that allow establishments to deviate slightly from collective bargaining agreements on work time. Standard hours, a major component of total work hours, vary considerably across Europe. Many countries lowered their standard work hours during the 1980s and 1990s, attempting to boost employment by splitting up a fixed number of worker-hours among more workers.

Germany has seen a partial reversal of the trend as several companies increased their standard hours to reduce their labor costs in the early 2000s. The employment effect of increased standard hours depends on the time horizon examined, how wages respond, whether employees collected overtime pay before the change, and the productivity of hours worked, among other factors. For non-exempt employees, the Fair Labor Standards Act stipulates a standard 40 hour workweek in the US. Anything above is considered overtime and must be paid at a rate of 1.5 times the normal wage. However, there is no limit on the amount of overtime or hours of work per week and little regulation of annual leave and rest periods. The average annual working hours in the US were rather high at 1779 hours in 2019.

When employing remotely, you will need to be aware of the variation in working hours across your team so you can employ your remote talent compliantly. Though certain international standards prevail, different countries' working hours vary a lot. What's more, while labour laws set standards, the reality can still be quite different. For example, men tend to work longer hours in paid employment compared to women, particularly where maximum legal working hours are high. The amount of paid leave and public holidays also affects the total number of hours people work in a year. Beyond regular working hours, it is legal to demand up to 12 hours of overtime during the week, plus another 16 hours on weekends.